Free public resource · Learn through the Cash Property Academy

Research and learning method

From public record to understandable decision support.

The evidence standards behind Academy lessons, property education, and the developing St. Louis Housing Stability research program.

Updated 2026-07-16

The evidence chain

A reliable claim should connect to a source, a date, a defined concept, and a stated limitation. The Academy separates what a source directly says from what the editorial team infers or recommends operationally.

  • Identify the decision the reader is trying to make.
  • Locate the controlling or administering primary source.
  • Confirm the source date, scope, geography, and definitions.
  • Explain the idea in plain language without expanding the claim.
  • Add a scenario that tests understanding without pretending to resolve an individual case.
  • Name the point at which a qualified counselor, attorney, tax professional, or other expert is needed.

Local data work

The research center will use official, privacy-conscious data to study housing stability in St. Louis. A public source registry, field definitions, inclusion rules, known gaps, and reproducible calculations should accompany every released measure.

We will not publish a neighborhood score until the underlying data, limitations, and risk of stigmatizing residents or places have been reviewed. Research should illuminate systems—not label households.

What counts as an update

A corrected typo does not necessarily change the reviewed date. A new program rule, changed phone number, revised eligibility statement, new dataset, or altered recommendation does. Material updates are recorded and the page date changes.